This month we are looking at female pioneers of the silent era. Last time out we started off with Lillian Gish and her masterpiece The Wind. Today we go to one of her best friends and the second winner of the Best Actress Academy Award Mary Pickford. Pickford was one of America’s sweethearts for over 25 years and her importance to film as we know it is unparalleled. Today we will be looking at her 1918 film Stella Maris which saw Pickford play two roles.
Stella Maris is a young woman who is an invalid and thanks to her relatives have been kept indoors her entire life, to help Stella remain positive about the world, despite War and poverty happening all around her. Ever guardians over protectiveness cause even visitors to Stella to convey a life of happiness. One such visitor is John who has developed a flirtatious relationship with Stella, despite being married (something he hides from her to spare her feelings).
Meanwhile, at John’s home his cruel alcoholic wife Louisa has taken in orphan Unity to be their new housemaid due to the city’s housekeepers refusing to work for her. When Louisa is jailed for multiple years for abused poor Unity. Both Unity and Stella separately begin to fall in love with him and try to prove that they can live a life with him, to grave consequences for one.
Stella Maris is almost stereotypical in its melodrama, something Pickford could never truly shack for the majority of her career after realising the value within her “brand” as the young and innocent young woman. The direction assists greatly in helping the audience see how great Pickford’s performance is here. By going back and forth between the two continually we are constantly witnessing how truly different these two characters lives truly are.
For all of the acclaim that Pickford rightly receives for Stella Maris, Conway Tearle is equally as terrific. While he has to act like the world is fine around Stella (and to him, she is making the world better) he also has to handle being in an abusive marriage and deal with Louisa’s consequences of adopting poor Unity.
A great scene between John and Unity is when she is cleaning around the house and breaks something. Immediately because of the abuse she has received all her life, she lies about it and when John finds out that she has lied, she winces, awaiting the punishment. Instead, he comforts her, both surprised at the other’s reaction. It is a great moment. Just sadly for Unity, it is more a paternal moment than romantic.
A lot has been made about the ending of the film, but to me, it makes sense for the characters to do what they did to a point. I understand Unity sacrificing herself to rid John of Louisa so that he and Stella should be together. John never shows any romantic interest in Unity, only in that paternal way. Unity sees that towards the end of the film and because he has shown her kindness finally in her life, she wants to see him happy and does what she does. Should she have done it? Possibly not, but her letting John and Stella be together is the right choice. It should be noted that this was an adaption and not something that the filmmakers could drastically change.
Frances Marion writing shows her skills at being able to adapt works for the screen in such a direct yet emotionally pulling manner. The novel has a lot more going on and Marion was able to expertly streamline it for a feature film. How we miss such talents now. Stella Maris was a calculated risk for Pickford, she knew she could potentially alienate her audience with Unity, but had the chance to gain tremendously from it if audiences latched on to both characters. The risk truly did pay off.
It is fairly obvious that Pickford wanted to try and branch out a little from playing the young girl in her feature films. While there is no apparent need for Unity and Stella to be played by the same person Pickford does so with gusto, an attempt to show the wide range she has to her wide and devoted audience. What better way to show your skills as an actress than playing polar opposite characters in the same movie?
By keeping her core audience pleased by playing the “perfect golden curled girl” in Stella, Pickford was able to them take risks with her performance of Unity. By playing both characters at different heights was a great touch as it allowed her to show Unity being worn down by life, almost constantly hunched with a twisted spine due to malnutrition with her hair constantly pinned up. It may be a simple trick but it is still a very effective one. At times you would not think these were the same actress and that is exactly what Pickford wanted.
Unity was Pickford’s chance to remind the world that she could play a dramatic role very well and she does so with great ease that it is truly a shame that she did not do it more. Unity is intensely physical throughout the film with her mannerisms and actions. Nonstop movement. Compare this in contrast to Stella who is loose, fluid and happy. Unbelievable work from Pickford.
Apparently, her methods and techniques to change into Unity caused a lot of concern on the studio lot who thought that Pickford was throwing away her career for artistic integrity. Pickford was able to bring some of her known comedic talents to Unitys role, such as her daydreaming of walking with John, by merely using his coat on a coatrack. It is simple things like this that help brings the audience to care for Unity and hurt more when she decides to take actions into her own hands.
Again, it has to be mentioned that not only how different Stella and Unity are, but how their arcs are also polar opposite, one has to adjust to a world where pain and suffering expectantly exists whereas the other has to deal with the pain and loneliness she has already endured all of her life and to try and improve herself so she can be with the one she loves. To play such starkly different roles and arcs take a lot of effort, but to make sure that she does not undercut the importance of either character and make one or the other the focus of the picture is a very hard scenario to juggle.
Stella Maris helped Mary Pickford show the world that she had terrific range as an actress, something she would prove when she would play on stage to prove a point to directors and studio heads. It is a must-watch and a great starting point into her career. Mary Pickford wore many hats in Hollywood, world-famous actress, a producer, a studio head and a founder of the Motion Picture Academy. For all intents purposes, she was the most powerful woman in Hollywood at the time, not very many, if any other women have wielded the power she did. It should be remembered how much influence she has had on Hollywood as it seems even Hollywood itself has forgotten.
I am but a small website in this big wide world. As much as I would love to make this website a big and wonderful entity. That would bring in more costs. So, for now all I hope is to make Upcoming On Screen self-sufficient. Well enough to where any website fees are less of a worry for me in the future. You can support the website below…
You can support us in a variety of ways (other than that wonderful word of mouth) and those lovely follows. If you are so inclined to help out then you can support us via Patreon, find our link here! We don’t want to ask much from you, so for now we have limited our tiers to £1.50 and £3.50. These will of course grow the more we plan to do here at Upcoming On Screen.
Buy Us A Coffee
Our other method if through the wonderful Buy us a Coffee feature, but seeing as we are not the biggest fans of coffee, a pizza will do! We keep it fairly small change on that as well and it allows you to give just a one off payment, so no need to worry about that monthly malarky! We even have a little icon on the website for you to find it and help us out with the running of the website.
You can also support us via Twitter and Facebook by giving us a follow and a like. Every one helps!
2 thoughts on “Mary Pickford, Stella Maris (1918) – Retrospective Review”